Skip to content

Category: Politics

The 2024 election and the consequences of living in a relativist society

Over the last few weeks, I have broken my cardinal rule of not posting political things on my social media accounts.

Strangely enough, my posts were not intended to be political but to be a commentary on America running off the cliff into the abyss of relativism. More specifically, it was my assessment of American institutions—government, media, academia, etc.—whose objective has become to feed a narrative rather than seek truth.

America has ceased seeking truth for years; however, in the four years and particularly in the summer of 2024, we have gone from ceasing to simply seek truth to actively and deliberately running from it.

This concerns me greatly. A nation concerned more about outcomes than it about pursuing truth cannot stand. It will implode.

Of course, trying to raise this concern without being perceived as political is a hefty task. Actually, it’s nearly impossible.

Nearly every time I posted, the comments immediately turned political. Almost immediately, comments turned to: 1) Donald Trump is a dangerous enough threat toward democracy that he should be taken out, and 2) Kamala Harris is the greatest thing since perforated toilet paper.

I had refused—not perfectly—to jump into the comments when they turned political, and frankly it was at times it was hard to hold my tongue (E.g. Kamala is an eloquent speaker–?!). I can’t tell how many times I wrote a response only to delete. Whenever the comments turned political—including my own, it missed the point of my initial purpose—to point out the danger of a society bedding itself with relativism.

What do I mean by relativism? This concept was first introduced to the universe when they serpent told Adam and Eve: they will be like God.

The serpent was trying to get these imago dei humans to eat from the tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil.One may immediately wonder: what’s wrong with knowing good from evil? Isn’t that a good thing?

When you connect “you will be like God” with eating from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, it is moee than just knowing the difference.

It means defining the difference. It means I get to decide. It means each of us gets to decide what is good and evil.

Billions of humans each deciding what is good and evil for themselves.

That spells chaos.

That explains why America is on the precipice.

Without objective truth, each of us alone defines right and wrong. If we feel something is evil by own definition, it doesn’t take much at all to dehumanize the other and justify defeating them by any means necessary—whether it be destroying their livelihoods, their relationships, their character or even their very lives. After all, if it is good or bad in our own eyes we can do whatever it takes to take the life of whomever we might call evil.

Which would also explain why 28% of surveyed Democrats, according to a Rasmussen poll, wished Trump’s shooter hadn’t missed. It makes one wonder how many more quietly wished it even while uttering the meaningless platitude that they are against all political violence before going into the Trump is a villain rant.

Sidenote: Now right here, I know someone will ask how come I only bring up examples on the democratic side? Frankly, my response is because the press won’t hold their side accountable. I contend that the media, the institution of government, academia, social media, and the entertainment industry are all mouth pieces for the left. Very, very few of them have anything negative to say about Harris despite her many, many shortcomings, flaws, and black marks on her record.

Conservatives hear about their side’s shortcomings real and imagined so frequently they become memes in our circles. I will bet anything that whoever the GOP picks in 2028 will be labelled a misogynist white nationalist—even if its Tim Scott or Nikki Haley, will be labeled a threat to democracy, and there will likely be at least 12 women lining up to testify they were sexually assaulted by said candidate 50 years ago.

Instead of trying to deflect, understand that the left isn’t all halos and good times. There are a lot of things I don’t like about the GOP, which is why I am registered as an Independent. Trump is a bulldozer in a china shop. Eight months ago, I wish it was someone else. Harris on the other hand is empty, vapid, and deceitful. If she is a moderate, then I have some swamp land in Arizona to sell you.

Honestly, I am not crazy about Trump. But I am vehemently against Harris.

Back to my point (see, even I was starting to roll around in the political sewer). We must return to that objective truth that says no outcome is worth turning a blind eye to the nefarious ways of getting there. If one has to put their thumb on the scale to reach an outcome, their cause is not worthy and their legitimacy will always be in question.

But we can’t see anything beyond the desired outcome. We must return to a definition of right and wrong that come from beyond ourselves.

The United States will exist in some form after this November 5. But we will be nothing more than a shell of our former goodness.

We must seek—no, demand—truth from all American institutions. Not shift the goal posts. Not nuance away. Not deny. Not justify.

I am tired of being lied to–by the press, by our government, and by the “experts.” I am done trusting these institutions if given no reason to trust them. Either tell me the truth or stay out of my way.

That shouldn’t be too hard of a request.

When a public official takes the oath of office, they are swearing that oath to his or her ultimate boss, We the People. And we the people have to have the wisdom and discernment to hold them accountable. We can’t rely on conspiracy theories or unverified facts by some joker (like me!) on social media. We must research for ourselves. We must verify. We must be smart.

But most importantly we must be a moral person, moral not by whatever definition we personally make up but by an objective morality.

If we have no moral compass, no passion for truth, then our once great nation will die a humiliating and painful death.

The good news is, however, that whatever that outcome in November, we can take assurance that our King will still be on the throne.

1 Comment

Has God removed his lampstand from our nation?

It’s only been about 24 hours—one single day—since a would-be assassin nearly took aim at a former president. When I first heard about it, I posted a brief satire about possible ways the media would respond. My goal was to highlight the parody the media has become.

Sure enough, American journalism didn’t let us down. One prominent reporter for NBC was one of many who blamed Trump’s “heated rhetoric” as the reason a gunman tried to kill him. Another posted on X that there was no need to worry: “Trump’s ear was safe.” Another brushed aside the events of yesterday as though presidential assassination in almost common occurrence. Time magazine announced in a post on X that the political motivations of the shooter were unclear. (Fortunately, that post got ratioed and community notes were added mentioning the photo of a “Biden-Harris” bumper sticker on his truck, the over 20 donations to the Democratic Party, and several posts declaring Trump must be stopped.)

And the list of insanity among America’s “elite” goes on and on.

Honestly, if the earth moved under my feet, and the press was broadcasting that we just had an earthquake, I would be skeptical to believe them. They’ve lost that much credibility.

I am irritated by the media’s lack of self-awareness. They will look at the American people right in the eye as they tell us how objective they are. This lack of self-awareness is due, I contend, from the fact that the left controls not only the media, but big tech, the entertainment industry, academia, and big corporations. They can say pretty much whatever they want knowing it is very likely they won’t be called out for such a stupid comment.

Just once I would like to hear someone from the left condemn this specific act, not just the vague condemnation of “all political violence” before immediately going into the “both sides do it” deflection to try to lessen the shock that someone tried to kill a former president.

Honestly, the 2024 election cycle in the United States has made me wonder if God has removed his lampstand from this nation.

There is no truth in us. One candidate’s entire strategy is avoidance and deception. The other gets shot at after years of vilification from the left who now insist it’s the victims fault. And most of the country can barely look up from their cell phones to understand what is going on.

Our country cannot go on like this. We need to be a people who pursue truth more than their cause.

However, I have said before that I don’t see that happening. We’re too far gone. I truly believe God has turned the United States over to our sin.

Christ-followers need to pursue truth more than our cause. We need to be lovers of the Truth and call out the father of lies—even if they are proclaimed within our own political philosophy.

We have to become human again and quit justifying specific acts of violence to better fit our narrative.

We need to be honest with ourselves. And, unlike the media, we must be self-aware.

Can we get there? Sadly, I am not so sure. I can already anticipate the responses of “Yeah but,” and “What about…”

And I don’t think we Americans have the intellectual capacity to go beyond that level of response.

Has God removed his lampstand from this country? Truly only God knows that answer. Personally, I am afraid he has.

To get it back we must cry out to a merciful God for forgiveness. And we must be pursuers of truth, not justifiers of lies. There is no cause worthy of a lie. None.

We must be honest with ourselves.

Brutally honest.

And God help us all.

Leave a Comment

Predicting the national response to Trump’s second assassination attempt: God help us.

Second assassination attempt today on a former president in about two months. Here’s a list of probable media responses:

1) Forget about by Tuesday

2) Downplay it by Monday

3) Question if it was real bullets from a real gun

4) Blame Trump for being so divisive, thus bringing it on himself

5) Link Trump to white supremacy, thus bringing it on himself

6) Make calls for toning down the heated rhetoric, especially that coming from that white fascist who is an existential threat to democracy and therefore must be stopped

7) Remind us that Kamala wants to heal our land

8) Publish a statement from the Harris Campaign that will read, “We condemn all violence. Vice President Harris grew up in a middle class family and loves the smell of cut grass. She understands what people are going through. Oh, and she doesn’t want to ban guns, except for the guns she wants to ban, but she believes in the 2nd Amendment with the exception of the guns most Americans own because her values haven’t changed. And did we mention that she understands the plight of the American people. And…who got shot at again?”

9) Write a Pulitzer worthy scoop about how the shooter used the word “trump” in a high school essay and is thus a Trump supporter and thus a white supremacist.

10) If the shooter turns out to be a liberal, refer to number 8 above as quickly as possible.

I wish this wasn’t funny, but the collective has made a parody of themselves.

Leave a Comment

It’s time for “We the People” to grow up

I am going to do something I fight with myself every day to keep from doing: dive into politics on social media. In truth, what’s on my heart goes much deeper than political issues, and given America’s lack of ability to go beyond mere surface issues, it will likely go there. Still, I am going to put myself out there. Forgive the length.

In 2024, America is a dumpster fire. Sure, one can argue that the country has been a dumpster fire throughout the last decade; however, I feel that, over this summer, the flames have reached the half-filled gas cans and chemicals at the bottom of the dumpster and are about to explode.

2024 is a presidential election season, so we can usually expect a clown show that makes the movie “Idiocracy” less satirical and more prophetical.

But this one has been utterly bizarre. Since July, we watched a presidential debate which caused one campaign to implode. We witnessed an assassination attempt of a candidate by a 20-year-old kid who outsmarted what was thought to be the world’s most elite protection agency. Fortunately, a mere cock of the head made the difference between a clean shot to the temple and the a glance off the top of the ear. Then came Joe Biden suspending his campaign after being “encouraged” to do so. Then Vice-President Kamala Harris accepted the nomination without a single vote. This was followed by a media frenzy to literally rewrite history before our very eyes in order to sanitize her extreme radical statements and word salads into a more moderate position.

Then came the Olympics, from the opening ceremony to the women’s boxing controversy with a female competitor forfeiting the match after two blows to the head by a wannabe woman.

This summer has been unsettling to say the least. Questions rose within me, which really are more rhetorical than not but which will likely be deflected as “talking points” by people who would rather not think about them. They’re real questions asked by someone who is trying to truly understand the dumpster fire we’re currently in.

First, how did the media spend the last three-plus years trying to convince the masses that the president was sharp as a tack only to express surprise at his mental decline following the debate? For that matter, how did the White House press secretary get away with zero accountability after blaming Biden’s strange movements and distant expressions as “cheap fakes” only to drop the term following the debate?

How did a 20-year-old kid get on a rooftop 140 yards from his target with a rifle and a range finder under the watchful eye of the Secret Service? How is it that after three weeks they still don’t seem to know what happened?

Why are far too many people—from social media geeks to a firefighter to a city council member to a police sergeant—lamenting the fact that the shooter missed? How has society grown so barbaric?

How is it that following the shooting, the president tells the nation to tone down the heated rhetoric only to then call his opponent the greatest threat to democracy?

How is it those in charge proclaim with absolute certainty that they are fully accountable for the failures without actually being held accountable?

How is MSNBC’s Joy Reid still taken seriously after saying a case of Covid is just no different than getting shot in the head? For that matter, a week after the shooting, how can Whoopi Goldberg criticize Trump’s granddaughter’s speech for humanizing the man, urging her viewers that we can’t let them humanize him?

Have we lost the ability to detect irony? For that matter, how is it we are supposed to trust any of these institutions any more in word or in deed?

Is the media bipolar? How is it that the same media fawn all over Biden the last three years only to demand he step aside following the debate and before once again fawning all over him as “the greatest president ever” once he finally did so?

How is it the Vice-President with favorability ratings consistently the high 20s suddenly jump overnight be nearly 50%? Why is it that someone known to be the queen of word salads and zero accomplishments as VP, is now said to be the next greatest president ever?

Why are we letting the media scrub the internet of Harris as “border czar” even though they used that term regularly over the last few years? How come the title “most liberal senator” is now something that’s trying so hard to be hidden? How is she being hailed as a moderate even though there’s actual video of her saying the most insane things?

In the world of sports, how can the opening ceremony be hailed as unifying when it offends 25% of the world’s population? How can the organizers and participants claim that the last supper scene with drag queens was both based on that scene while at the same time saying it was a festival celebrating Dionysius? Is Dionysius the first thing that comes to mind when thinking of French culture?

How is Christians protesting the ceremony are told to get over it by the same people who in a million years would never do anything close to that with the prophet Muhammad? Or is the terrorist attack against the satirical magazine “Charlie Hebdo” still too fresh in their minds?

How is it that female boxer had to forfeit everything she worked for after getting hit in the head twice in 30 seconds by a wannabe woman? In pretty much everywhere, wouldn’t that be called domestic violence? Even after she said she (the real woman) had never felt a punch so hard before, she nevertheless received criticism for not shaking the dude’s hand after the match? Why is the media trying so hard to downplay this?

Why is it conservatives are called weird for their beliefs by a presidential candidate who has her picture taken alongside a dude with a beard in a dress while insisting men can have periods and get pregnant? How is this considered normal?

Further, how is it possible that anyone who asks questions like these considered bigoted and full of hate?

Honestly, any attempt to answer any of these questions will likely fall flat.

I am asking these questions—truly unsettling to one who is trying to get his head around what’s going on. These questions are really a reflection of a far bigger problem: us.

We the people.

We no longer strive for truth, but only what we want to hear. We are willing to be intellectually dishonest in order to justify our beliefs. We nuance, redefine, or move the goalposts to support our biases. We will even agree with that previous statement while having no intention of ceasing to do it ourselves.

Sadly, I am seeing a potential end of our society, and this is not because of whichever candidate wins the White House. I see it because we the people refuse to hold any standards or accountability toward politicians with whom we agree while accusing the others of setting double standards.

No matter who wins in November, the dumpster fire will continue to burn.

We the people are to blame for allowing these institutions to pour fuel on the fire.

Leave a Comment

It is time us Americans to grow up

Fifty—a hundred—years from now, history is going to shine its light on this past week in the United States and cringe if not maybe throw up in its mouth a little.

One week ago today, former president—and current presidential candidate—Donald Trump was shot during a campaign rally. By what many called divine intervention, Trump turned his head as the shooter pulled the trigger, marking the difference between a clean head-shot and a mere grazing of the ear.

Before this, every presidential assassination—or attempt—has caused the nation to pause. It didn’t matter if one was a Democrat or Republican, Americans have instinctively circled the wagons around their leader to collectively share their horror, grief, and anger following the event.

I was in the seventh grade with President Ronald Reagan was shot by John Hinckley, Jr. Lesson plans were put on hold as my teacher wheeled in a TV set to watch the updates following the horrific event. Politics paused. Debate took a breath. America became united that day.

At least for a time.

That was when we were still human.

That was when we saw each other as human.

That was when we weren’t categorized by our political or religious opinions.

This last week was the antithesis to all of American history.

The week following Trump’s assassination attempt was not the starting point of this change. It was more of a culmination.

In the hours since a bloodied Trump was rushed off-stage, posts surfaced on social media of individuals grieving that fact that the shooter missed. And this wasn’t just limited to wannabe influencers screaming in their parents’ basements. A Pennsylvania Fire Chief advised the shooter: “A little to the right next time please.”[1] (Ironically, the one individual killed during the assassination attempt was Pennsylvania firefighter Corey Comperatore.) A police sergeant in Dallas posted: “Aim better.”[2] A staffer for the New Jersey Education Association, stated: “What we know: they missed. Smh.”[3] A teacher in Ardmore City Schools in Oklahoma wished the Trump shooter “had [a] better scope.”[4] A school counselor in Yadkin County Schools posted: “I’m currently sitting on the beach this afternoon, disturbed by the fact, sickened with myself, that I was disappointed the shooter missed when I saw the news.”[5]

Fortunately, all of those examples posted above were either fired or resigned following the exposure to their hatred.

How did America get to this? How have we crossed the line between arguing over different political philosophies and wishing political opponents dead.

The media has to take a great deal of the blame. The late commentator Dr. Charles Krauthammer once said “Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil.”

The media, government bureaucracy, and the entertainment industry has run with the latter.

For nine years, Trump was vilified, demonized, and dehumanized in these institutions. In this campaign, the Democrats have run solely on Trump being “an existential threat to American democracy.” Joe Biden himself stated that Donald Trump and his voters “represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our Republic.”[6]

For nine years, America has seen photos of “comedian” Kathy Griffin holding up a bloodied, severed head of Trump, Madonna saying she would like to blow up the White House, TV anchors and journalist calling everything Trump said were “lies” without specifically describing what those lies are. Then a week before the assassination attempt, one magazine cover showed a close-up of Trump with a Hitler mustache. Recently, New York congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, tapping into her hyperbole and lack of historical understanding, referred to Trump as a Nazi. This vitriolic rhetoric has come from the highest levels, including Biden himself. Even the White House itself has called Trump a fascist, racist, and “existential threat to democracy.”

With that kind of rhetoric, it is no surprise that one off-kilter ne’er-do-well decided to take it in his own hands to “neutralize” this threat to democracy. With that kind of vitriol, it was simply a matter of time before something like this was to happen.

My hope in the days after the Trump shooting would be that America would pause in the same way it had done throughout history. I prayed we would take time to reflect how we got here. There were calls to tone down the heated rhetoric. However, in typical American methodology, we acknowledged the heated rhetoric while at the same time justifying their own rhetoric because the other side is so evil.

I at least hoped that the media would stop and reflect what part they played in the heated rhetoric.

Sadly, that was not to happen.

The initial CNN headline initially reporting the assassination attempt was—and I wish I was joking: “Secret Service Rushes Trump Off Stage After He Falls at Rally.” The Associated Press’s headline read: “Donald Trump Has Been Escorted Off The Stage During A Rally After Loud Noises Ring Out In The Crowd.”[7]

In the days to follow, individuals seriously asked if the shooting was staged with one report stating in a poll 12% “suspected the event was ‘planned’, and 33% of Joe Biden’s supporters thought it was a set up.”[8]  (And I thought conservatives were supposed to be the conspiracy theorists.) Fortunately, most of the main press openly corrected that misinformation.

Still, one does not look far to see the media downplay the shooting or simply to redraw the focus. When Trump stands after being shot and shouts “Fight! Fight! Fight!”, CNN’s Jamie Gangel lamented that this is “not the message that we want to be sending right now.”[9] CNN played victim in the aftermath: “You’re Next: Some Trump supporters blame the media for the assassination attempt.”[10] ABC’s George Stephanopoulos while basically denying President Biden contributed to the heated rhetoric implied Trump and his supporters share some of the blame: “President Trump and his supporters have – have contributed to this violent rhetoric as well.”[11] (Note: to a point, he is correct; however, to compare the Conservative’s rhetoric with that of Progressive’s is like comparing the shooting a bullet and throwing one.)

Likely the most retarded—and I use the literally definition of the word—came from MSNBC’s Joy Reid who, not only questioned if Trump was even shot, compared President Biden getting COVID (something that has happened to him three times) with Trump getting shot (something that has happened only a handful of times in American history:

This current President of the United States is 81 years old and has COVID, should he be fine in a couple of days, doesn’t that convey exactly the same thing? That he’s strong enough – older than Trump – to have gotten something that used to really be fatal to people his age. So, if he does fine out of it and comes back and is able to do rallies, isn’t that exactly the same?[12]

Sadly, America has not used the time following the shooting to reflect and commit to doing rhetoric differently. We have not looked within to see how we ourselves, individually and institutionally, contributed to the problem. (I even see a progressive response to this essay as: “well, you’re doing it right now” although I propose that shining a light on ugly examples of heated rhetoric is not the same as calling someone Hitler or wishing death upon political opponents.)

On Friday(July 19), congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee lost the battle to cancer at the age of 72. She was a Democrat and very liberal. Instead of celebrating her death, Republican Senator Ted Cruz posts: “I am deeply saddened by the passing of my friend & colleague Sheila Jackson Lee. She was a tireless advocate for Houston. I will always cherish our friendship & the laughter we shared throughout the years. Heidi & I offer our prayers and sincerest condolences to her family.”[13]

We can and will have heated political discourse. That’s the strength of our republic.

But we have to stop seeing each other as evil. No one running for office is an “existential threat to democracy.” Anyone who has a novice knowledge of history knows that no one running for office is anything close to Adolf Hitler.

It is a difference of opinion. Everyone has one.

The person expressing a difference is still a human, one created in God’s image.

It is clear we can’t trust the media to tone down the heated rhetoric.

Instead, we have to do it ourselves.

I truly believe this is an area where the kingdom of God can clearly lead.


[1] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pennsylvania-fire-chief-resigns-over-inappropriate-post-about-trump-assassination-attempt/ar-BB1q6w6O

[2] https://www.dallasnews.com/news/public-safety/2024/07/15/donald-trump-shooting-dallas-police/

[3] https://www.shorenewsnetwork.com/2024/07/16/njea-staffer-goes-dark-after-posting-comment-about-shooter-missing-trump/

[4] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/oklahoma-education-official-to-revoke-license-of-teacher-who-wished-trump-shooter-had-better-scope/ar-BB1qaOKL

[5] https://www.yadkinripple.com/townnews/politics/yadkin-schools-counselor-resigns-following-trump-comments/article_dd95eec2-4446-11ef-a79d-6789cdc02aff.html

[6] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-calls-for-calm-after-years-of-calling-trump-threat-to-democracy/ar-BB1q0UbZ

[7] https://nypost.com/2024/07/14/opinion/lefty-media-kept-bias-on-full-display-after-trump-was-shot/

[8] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/a-fifth-of-us-voters-think-donald-trump-s-shooting-could-have-been-staged/ar-BB1q5TuZ

[9] https://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnns-jamie-gangel-complains-about-trump-shouting-fight-fight-fight-just-seconds-after-being-shot/

[10] https://www.cnn.com/trump-supporters-blame-media/index.html

[11] https://www.mediaite.com/tv/abcs-martha-raddatz-singles-out-republican-rhetoric-for-ire-in-wake-of-attempted-

[12] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/joy-reid-suggest-biden-recovering-from-covid-is-exactly-the-same-thing-as-trump-surviving-an-assassination/ar-BB1qblgY

[13] https://www.khou.com/article/news/local/sheila-jackson-lee-death-reaction/285-ea90e62c-6299-4dad-9b55-49cb35f951f3

1 Comment

How the church lost our prophetic voice in 2016 (and how we might get it back)

On Friday, our next president will be sworn in.

The 2016 election ended the most bizarre, unsettling campaign season I’ve ever seen. Afterward I felt great relief, not because my candidate won (I couldn’t vote for either major candidate) but because it was finally over.

Thankfully, mercifully, happily over.

Then the protests and riots began—the most violent of them in my hometown of Portland, Oregon. The losers threw tantrums while the winners gloated.

My heart hasn’t stopped aching about the 2016 election season. However, what troubled me most was not the candidates, but the body of Christ. I consider 2016 to be the year the church lost its prophetic voice.

Both progressive and conservative Christians took their eyes off God’s simple requirement: to act justly, love mercy, and walk humbly with God (Micah 6:8). Each side seemed to have a sickening case of tunnel vision, condemning vile behaviors in the other candidate while overlooking equally vile behaviors in their own. God’s people could have called for justice and repentance without scrambling down into the mud with everyone else. But we didn’t. So we lost our prophetic voice.

What do I mean by prophetic voice?

Consider King David.

In 2 Samuel, David had just committed a string of terrible sins. First, he sleeps with the wife of Uriah, one of his top warriors. Then, when she gets pregnant, he craftily calls Uriah back from the battlefield for a little—ahem!—“R&R” with her, to hide who the father is; but Uriah won’t enter his own home because doing so would dishonor his fellow warriors, who are still fighting and can’t enjoy such luxuries. Thwarted, David resorts to premeditated murder. He commands his general to put Uriah on the front lines and then withdraw the troops, leaving Uriah to be killed.

The plan works; David gets away with both adultery and murder.

Until the prophet Nathan shows up to tell the king a story:

“There were two men in a certain town, one rich and the other poor. The rich man had a very large number of sheep and cattle, but the poor man had nothing except one little ewe lamb he had bought. He raised it, and it grew up with him and his children. It shared his food, drank from his cup and even slept in his arms. It was like a daughter to him. Now a traveler came to the rich man, but the rich man refrained from taking one of his own sheep or cattle to prepare a meal for the traveler who had come to him. Instead, he took the ewe lamb that belonged to the poor man and prepared it for the one who had come to him” (1 Samuel 12:1-4).

Hearing this tale of injustice, David rages: “As surely as the Lord lives, the man who did this must die! He must pay for that lamb four times over, because he did such a thing and had no pity” (12:5-6).

Only then does Nathan close the trap: “You are that man” (12:7).

This story can help us understand the prophetic voice, and also how we lost it.

The prophetic voice speaks truth to power. Nathan had to deliver a stinging rebuke to a king. Although David’s kingdom was ruled by God’s law (the Torah), in a monarchy the king is the arbiter of the law, and can essentially do whatever he wants. Though David was considered a man after God’s own heart, he did not hesitate to commit sin and then hide it.

I admit I can get pretty starry-eyed around “kings” (people who have wealth and fame – like when I used to do on-air interviews of musicians, politicians, and other celebrities at a Christian radio station). In fact, who doesn’t? For some reason, most of us want rich, famous people to think we are cool. However, if God so instructed, would I have the courage to speak God’s uncomfortable truth to power? Nathan did, even knowing it might cause his political downfall or possibly his physical death.

It took great courage for the prophet to deliver this rebuke to a king. But the prophetic voice must speak God’s truth to whomever God instructs, no matter how powerful and no matter what the potential consequence.

The prophetic voice must transcend our own political agenda. Nathan could have convinced himself that maybe he didn’t hear God correctly, or that David’s sin wasn’t all that bad. After all, David was doing some great things: establishing a beautiful capital in Jerusalem, bringing the ark of the covenant back home, and defeating some pretty bad enemies of Israel. He was a good king overall, so why care about his personal life? Why bother with his sins (or “mistakes”)? After all, bringing him down would d– evastate not only the palace and royal family, but the entire nation as well.

When my alma mater’s president posed next to then-candidate Donald Trump with a Playboy cover on the wall behind them, I cringed. I know he didn’t pick where he stood in Trump’s office, but that photo seemed representative of what was going on among Christians at that time: we were more than willing to overlook sin if it benefited our political agenda. Maybe Trump was our guy because he preached pro-life, so we didn’t care about his playboy lifestyle; or maybe Clinton was our gal because she preached benefits for all, so we didn’t care about her unethical practices; or maybe Sanders was our guy because he preached social justice, so we didn’t care that he doesn’t even really believe in God.

So we lost the moral high ground. Or, as Judge Judy says, we accused without clean hands. We found that we cannot call out the splinter in our opponent’s eye when we have a plank in our own.

The prophetic voice should lead to a repentant heart. Nathan approached David not just to spew vitriole or delegitimize his kingship, but to call David to repentance. And David immediately responded, “I have sinned against the Lord” (12:13). Psalm 51 beautifully expresses his repentance:

Create in me a pure heart, O God,
and renew a steadfast spirit within me.
Do not cast me from your presence
or take your Holy Spirit from me.
Restore to me the joy of your salvation
and grant me a willing spirit, to sustain m
(Psalm 51:10-12).

True, David was a true follower of God who cared deeply about God’s opinion, while many of today’s politicians and pundits aren’t. Still, we don’t even try to do what Nathan did: confront them directly and call them to account, led by God with the purpose of effecting repentance. Instead we confront them indirectly on social media, led by our own silly passion—pointlessly mocking them, repeating wild rumors about them, and insulting their followers. That’s the world’s methodology, and we are not being God’s prophetic voice when we imitate it. Our objective must be repentance—which, by the way, always includes our own.

So, under a new president, can the church regain its prophetic voice? Or will we keep practicing the world’s ways of jeering, rejecting, and tearing down without building up?

I hope we’ll do the former. But we’ll have to look within. Will we try to speak God’s truth, in love, to everyone or just to those with whom we disagree? Will we seek justice for all, or only for those we personally deem oppressed? Will we pray for our president, not for him to grow a brain or roll over dead but to humbly repent, seek reconciliation, and lead our nation with wisdom and grace?

Nathan’s gentle, truthful approach softened David’s heart to hear God’s words. We too must maintain a gentle spirit of repentance for ourselves, our opposition, and our whole society. God’s kingdom must come first; no political party, preference, or agenda is more important.

To regain our prophetic voice, we must be brave, loving, and consistent, or else remain silent.

I am pretty sure silence is not an option.

We must do better.

Leave a Comment

Seriously, what is going on with this presidential election, and what do we do now?

hillary_clinton_vs-_donald_trump_-_caricaturesIn the last few days – amid yet another outbreak of scandalous news items and a second debate involving the Democratic and Republican presidential candidates – traditional and social media continue to warn us that if the “wrong” candidate wins, the sky will fall, children will starve, and the Yellowstone caldera will erupt.

Then there are thoughtful commentaries by Christian writers and leaders, trying to present biblical reasons why Christians should vote one way or the other. Theologian Mirasolv Volf says the policies of Hillary Clinton best represent Christian values; theologian Wayne argues that Trump is the better choice.

Christian progressives wag their fingers at Christian conservatives for being single-issue voters, without admitting that they themselves often are too. And don’t get me started on the old argument that “if you don’t vote, then X will win and the sky will fall, children will starve, and the Yellowstone caldera will erupt.”

If I am for anything in this election, it is for hitting the reboot button on 2016 and trying again.

I am pretty sure that as Jesus watches this election, he is slowly beating his head against the pearly gates.

Of all the presidential elections in my ever-lengthening lifetime, this one is the most bizarre, frustrating, and insane. If nothing else, it is a commentary on the level to which we the American people have sunk.

As an independent who leans right of center on most issues, my struggle is not which candidate to vote for, but whether to vote at all. I know, I know – in a constitutional democratic republic such as ours, voting is a privilege and a duty. I agree. But this time, it feels like a choice between being buried alive and being burned at the stake. How can I vote for either?

Honestly, as an evangelical Christian, I have serious problems with both of the top two candidates. Equally.

I know it’s un-Christlike, but I have trouble seeing either of them with the compassion of Christ. I would prefer that neither one be my president. Neither exhibits the moral compass or the character traits I desire in my nation’s leader. Both seem corrupted, out of touch with ordinary people, and willing to say anything to get votes. And in truth, one cannot—absolutely cannot—point out the character flaws in one without pointing out virtually the same flaws in the other. (The conspiracy theorist in me can’t shake the uneasy feeling that we, the people, are somehow being played.)

No matter who becomes president, I am not optimistic about the next four years.

So as Christ-followers, what do we do? Here is my advice to all Christian voters, which I really hope to follow myself.

Vote your own personal conscience. If, unlike me, you have a preference of one candidate over another, by all means vote. Even if you simply feel led to choose one as the lesser of two evils so the other doesn’t win, then cast your ballot. But don’t delude yourself that your candidate will advance Christian values. In politics, Christians – like most other segments of our society – are just a voting block to be patronized or demonized every election year. No matter what is promised before the election, Christian concerns are unlikely to carry any special clout afterward.

Pray for the candidates and other leaders. It looks like either Clinton or Trump soon will be elected president. Yet neither seems to be seeking God’s perspective. That’s all the more reason to follow the biblical mandate to pray for them, and for our other leaders. And our prayers should be not cynical (“Lord, help this idiot to get a clue”) but sincere, seeking God’s wisdom, discernment, and protection over the White House, Congress, and the Supreme Court as well. We must pray with a pure heart for the occupants of all three.

Remember that God’s kingdom is greater than earthly governments. The kingdom of God never has been, and never will be, represented by any secular government. It begins in our hearts, not in Washington, D.C. – and is carried out through our own actions, not through the actions of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of government. No matter who wins this election, things can change, rights can be taken, and Christians can be pushed further toward the margins. But the kingdom of God has outlasted countless forms of government in the last two thousand years. We can be pretty sure it will outlast a Clinton or Trump presidency. It will even outlast a shift in the Supreme Court.

In less than a month we will have a new president, and the winning side will wrongly claim that their win is a mandate. (I say wrongly because when a majority of voters see both candidates unfavorably and blindly vote for the one they find slightly less despicable than the other, that’s not a mandate.) Then the losing side will vow cooperation with the new administration, while at the same time planning its demise.

Many voters will be filled with gratitude that this surreal election is over – but also filled with fear and anger at the outcome. Maybe, instead of railing against the new administration, we should spend the next four years reflecting on how the winner was able to channel that fear and anger into votes by tickling our ears.

And each Christ-follower should spend the next four years being the church to his or her own little corner of the world. Doing so will bring change far better and faster than any bloated bureaucracy ever could.

6pnyquv

1 Comment

Reclaiming my identity in Christ, not politics

Especially during election season, politics make me crazy – and Facebook is the first place I show it.

Usually, it begins with news of some political action or position I find untenable. I sink into a funk and share witty quips to expose it – but too often I take personal aim at its supporters, devolving into biting sarcasm. Since my ultimate goal is to be loving, not biting, I’m constantly asking God to save me from myself (and constantly thanking him for the “delete” function).

One recent funk started on a Tuesday, the day of the Oregon primary election. All morning I tried to ignore my ballot on the corner of my desk, debating whether it was worth the effort to turn it in. I have never been so unexcited about voting in my life.

political_partiesLike millions of other voters, over time I have felt more and more beaten down by politicians from both major political parties – specifically by their tone-deaf disregard for us, their constituents. However, our current choices, specifically for president, seem no better than those of the past; in fact, to me they seem much worse. In most elections I am concerned that my candidate might lose, but this time I am horrified that one of the remaining choices is actually going to win.

They’ve ignored us, lied to us, insulted us, and promised us a fantasy so far beyond the Constitutional powers of a president that no president could legally deliver on it.

But we don’t seem to know or care; we just keep crying out, “Gimme! Gimme!”

It seems Paul’s ancient warning about theological pandering could apply almost equally to political pandering today:

For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear (2 Timothy 4:3, NIV).

Sadly, there are a lot of teachers, leaders, politicians, academics, and even ministers willing to tickle those itching ears. It is amazing how quickly we will abandon critical thinking in our quest for identity and security. Like a barnacle on a boat, we’ll latch on to anything – including any leader, no matter how crass, dishonest, or delusional – just to hear what we want to hear.

However, as I stared in depression at that ballot, I realized something which brought me great hope.

identity1It is this: I haven’t lost my identity at all. I am a follower of Jesus Christ. I identify with the kingdom of God. I don’t have to fight or campaign for it because it has been given to me. My kingdom identity cannot be taken from me in an election, nor is it represented by a political party. This identity does not need to be affirmed by a fickle candidate or cause, and its existence is not contingent on popular support.

Further, I realized that the church has an opportunity to re-establish its identity within the culture. No matter who wins the election, we may have lost the culture wars in America – but we can still be spiritual warriors in God’s kingdom.

How? To do so, we must wrestle with three important questions:

1) What is the church’s most important role in our society right now? Is it to champion a cause or a belief, or is it to serve people in Jesus’ name?

Currently, in the U.S., I believe it is the latter. The Christian right correctly believes we are to be a moral voice in our culture, telling the truth about sin and repentance. The Christian left correctly believes we are to be advocates for “the least of these,” helping the poor and oppressed. However, in both cases, we as Christians should be doing those things ourselves – not trying to get the government to do them.

2) Are we ready to submit all of our political agendas to Jesus as King? After all, when the presidential election is over, the “winners” will herald utopia while the “losers” will proclaim disaster; but the new administration will last only a few short years before another will take its place. Do we truly believe that God’s very kingdom itself depends on the outcome of human governments?

Newsflash: No political party – conservative, progressive, or socialist – can claim exclusive rights to the kingdom of God, which is far greater than Trump, Clinton, or Sanders. His kingdom will outlast this election and all future elections.

3) Are we willing to lose our place in society in order to gain Jesus? In the U.S., we Christians struggle with the idea that our faith is becoming marginalized. One could argue whether we were ever a “Christian” nation, but even if we were, we are quickly becoming a secular one. We are now on the outside looking in, living in the margins. The question is, what should we be doing in those margins?

Maybe, instead of working to reclaim America as a Christian nation, we should be working to surrender America to God.

No matter who wins the election.

thebodyofChrist

Leave a Comment

“Hosanna!”: The presidential election, terrorism, and the state of the world

Last Saturday in Arizona, protesters tried to silence a presidential candidate while supporters retaliated with fisticuffs.

Hours later, on Palm Sunday, Christians commemorated Jesus’s kingly entrance into Jerusalem.

The next day, in Brussels, terrorist attacks killed over 30 people and injured at least 200 more.

This year has been that kind of surreal.

The elections, the unrest, the terror—all of this craziness makes me feel overwhelmed. Overwhelmed and afraid.

I can’t quite describe my feelings, but they include anger, horror, frustration, numbness, bewilderment and more, depending on what’s in the news each day.

I am distressed and heartbroken over the terrorism, crying out to God for the victims. But I can’t stop it. So I focus on something closer to home: election year, and how our next president might respond to terrorism and all of the other problems facing us, both here and abroad.

uncertainty-aheadYet it unnerves me to think who We, the people may choose as our next president. I am so un-thrilled by the choices that if I had to vote today, I couldn’t, even while holding my nose. I simply cannot shake the feeling that we are preparing to elect a dictator—because that’s what we seem to want.

I say this because I see a trend of feverish devotion, with several candidates being exalted to nearly messianic status. I understand that in a democratic republic, researching the candidates and trying to support the best one is a good thing. But where is the line between “support” and “worship”?

I’m not sure, but I think we border on worship when we defend our candidates by…

-shouting down or cold-cocking the opposition.

-attacking other candidates’ shortcomings while giving our own candidate a pass for the same offenses.

-name-calling and bullying anyone who dares to question our candidate.

-insisting that our candidate is the only one who has the answers.

All of these could fit the definition of “worship.”

It’s funny how history repeats itself.

In 2008 we elected a president based on a promise of “hope and change”—yet the world is still divided, hate-filled, and violent. Now we are preparing to elect one based on promises of “revolution” or “national greatness.” More and more these days, we seem to believe that the right person will be able to solve everything, and ring in utopia. Yet in truth, any president is lucky to fulfill maybe five percent, at most, of everything promised on the campaign trail (because our laws clearly define what a president can and cannot do—thank goodness for the Constitution’s “division of powers”!). In fact, no matter how great their desire, vision, and ability, none of these leaders will ever be able to save us—as a nation, or as individuals.

It has never happened, and it never will. 

Well, except once.

Jesus arrived in Jerusalem on Palm Sunday, things were much the same as they are today. Then, as now, people felt a sense of political unrest and unhappiness with the government (and it was a government of brutal Roman occupiers, not their own self-government). Then, as now, many of Jesus’s followers were seeking a social revolution instead of a spiritual one. Then, as now, they despaired when their leader didn’t do what they wanted. And then, as now, people feared forces beyond their control and longed for a messiah to deliver them.

Yet Jesus came in riding into town not on a white steed, like a military hero, but on a humble donkey.

Palm%20Sunday_jpgAnd crowds of Jews spread palm branches before him and cried, “Hosanna!”—a rich, ancient word that we now use only on Palm Sunday. But I’m thinking we should revive it, because its meaning is, “Lord, save us!” (Psalm 118:25)—an urgent and desperate cry for deliverance.

The people were quoting this word from the Psalms. They weren’t welcoming Jesus into their city; they were pleading for divine rescue—as at Passover when God rescued their ancestors from slavery in Egypt, and as at Calvary when he rescued humanity from sin. No one knew it yet, but Jesus was coming to completely and finally answer the cries of “Hosanna.” He was coming to rescue us all.

Ironically, those cries for rescue would be answered just days later, after these same crowds turned on Jesus and demanded his death—the very death which would save the world.

If only they had known.

And now, during this holy Passion Week, we need saving more than ever. We see Americans attacking one another, a capital city recovering from fatal bombings, and a world possibly inching closer to the next great war.

None of this is exactly new (we’ve seen it all before), but it still feels so chaotic, so desperate, so uncertain. I simply do not have answers—nor, despite the politicians’ promises, does anyone else.

I’ve lived long enough to realize that we will never be rescued by anyone on the ballot.

And at that realization, my spirit cries, “Hosanna! Lord, save us!”

Only one Messiah has sacrificed himself for us, instead of for his own political ends. Only one Messiah possesses all of the power, authority, and credentials required to save us.

There is only one Savior.

And he is not currently running for President.

810_2689-f8-stars

Leave a Comment

Why I am already giving up on 2016

20130704-defeat-chess1When things are beyond our control, we tend to “give up” in one of two ways. The first way, which does little good, is to appear to give up by saying, “I’m done” – and throwing up our hands in disgust. The second way, which I recommend, is to truly give up.

Let me explain.

In 2015, I tried the first way.

I immersed myself in the news, trying to get my mind around the emerging crises of city riots, global terrorism, leadership vacuums, and the uneasy feeling that we may be headed toward another world war.

I couldn’t discuss these issues on social media, because the response there is always character assassination from angry people with pat answers which they (wrongly) believe will solve everything. So I internalized my concerns and frustrations. But that choice led to worry and despair. Many nights I couldn’t sleep because my mind raced with headlines, talking heads, and complete nonsense I had heard during the day.

Finally, I defiantly told the world (well, at least, my little world): “I’m done.” Done with the chaos that appeared to multiply with each passing day. Done with not being told the truth, or being told that the truth doesn’t matter. Done with the idiocy of social media. And definitely done with elections –all of the posturing, defending, promising, accusing, and denying.

Done.

I threw up my hands, gave the world the finger, and plunged my head into the sand. I chose ignorance over awareness. I pretended that since I couldn’t see or hear all the madness, it had disappeared.

On the surface, this approach had some merit: it gave me a moment of peace.

Unfortunately, though, the harder we try to ignore something, the more we think about it. Announcing “I’m done!” can never change the soul. Inside, I was still as uptight and stressed as ever.

So my moment of peace was an illusion, because it never healed my inner turmoil. It didn’t eliminate my frustration and anxiety, or their cause; it only drove them underground. My mouth said, “I’m done” – but my heart continued to pump vinegar. The fire – the fight – was still there. I was just denying the problem, yelling, “LA-LA-LA-LA-LA!” with my ears covered – and then washing my hands of the whole situation.

But in doing so, like Pontius Pilate, I missed the Truth himself – standing right in front of me.

I realized that, despite every attempt to withdraw and hide, I was still overwhelmed by the vitriol, the violence, the threat of war, the lack of direction, the uncertainty in the world. No matter what I did, I could not escape the insanity all around me.

At about that time, 2015 ended and 2016 began.

So I decided that in the new year, I would work on trying the second approach: truly giving up.

I would quit fighting. Raise the white flag. Tap out. Accept my total helplessness to affect world events. Understand that the issues before us have no simple solutions, no easy answers.

Truly giving up doesn’t mean washing my hands of the whole mess, but rather admitting it’s out of my hands. Embracing my inability to fix things. Acknowledging that there may be no earthly solutions at all.

3985490626_4ece1bf58aTruly giving up may seem like a hopeless response – but it is not, because it shifts my focus back to the Creator of the universe. And staying focused on him is the most hopeful response there is.

Since 2008, when “hope” was used as a campaign slogan, the word has lost its power. Just as in every other election, we placed hope in a finite man who made many promises, but things didn’t get better. In fact, one could argue that they’ve gotten worse. And now we have a new batch of candidates stepping up to the plate, again asking us to place our hope in them.

But by truly giving up, I am choosing to place my hope in God, who is far bigger than any candidate or cause.

When I do that, my peace returns. When I focus on Jesus, the Prince of Peace, I find peace that can’t be quashed by parliamentary procedures, executive orders, or judicial override. Peace that can’t be won or lost in an election. Peace that can’t be stomped out by terrorism.

Then I don’t have to work so hard to ignore all of the unraveling going on around me. I don’t have to fret, stress, or worry over it. Instead, I can give it up to a Creator who thoroughly understands every problem – and holds every solution.

And he is GOOD.

So that is why I choose to give up on 2016.

In other words: surrender.

Take it, Savior. It’s all yours.

550995_10150911342631192_1110867674_n

2 Comments